FIRST THEY DIDN’T like green. Now it’s red.
What’s with this town?
Last fall some business owners, unhappy with the vivid green color of The Los 3 Reyes Bakery in downtown Faribault, successfully got that building repainted a subtle gray-green. How? After bakery owner Mariano Perez said he couldn’t afford to repaint his recently-painted bakery, the objecting business people passed the hat. (Read my Sept. 30, Oct. 6 and Nov. 9, 2009, and March 4, 2010, posts for more background.)
All of this stirred up quite the debate in Faribault about the color of buildings in our historic downtown. From the man/woman on the street to the City Council to business owners to the Heritage Preservation Commission, everyone has an opinion, me included.
While I appreciate the historic beauty of old buildings, I really struggle with the whole idea of new government regulations or guidelines that aim at dictating color choices. Faribault already has sufficient guidelines in place to protect historic buildings.
What’s acceptable to me or the mayor or my neighbor as a color choice may be totally unacceptable to someone like Perez, who hails from Mexico.
And, just for the record, I embraced the original vivid green on Perez’ bakery.
Now, fast forward to this week, when the City Council adopted a resolution to apply for a Picture-It-Painted grant from the Southern Minnesota Initiative Foundation.
This time Banadir Restaurant, a Somali business two blocks from the Mexican bakery, is the target for a proposed new paint job. It seems “someone” doesn’t like the predominantly red, accented by green and white, building colors.
I as much as figured more buildings would be the focus of suggested facelifts.
According to the adopted City Council resolution (published on the city Web site), the Picture-It-Painted grant application was “developed jointly with the property owner of 211 Central Avenue and the Faribault Area Chamber of Commerce.”
The resolution continues: “…the City has determined there is a public benefit to submitting this application in order to preserve and enhance a contributing building located within the historic commercial district.”
OK then, how do you define “enhance?” Is a new paint color more enhancing than the red, green and white already on the building?
Or would this be a step toward limiting freedom of choice? I think so.
Information from the SMIF Web site states that “project priority (is) based on visual impact, public benefit, volunteer participation and support, intended use, and benefit to those in need.”
To add to the drama, consider this: City staff submitted the Picture-It-Painted grant before the City Council approved the submission. The grant application deadline was March 3 and the Council approved the resolution, by a 4 – 2 vote, on March 9. Is this normal procedure, to submit a grant application first and then ask for rubber stamp approval later?
The debate continues. Grant awardees will be notified by the end of March. Will Banadir Restaurant be repainted or not?
What’s your take on all of this? I welcome comments and insights.
© Copyright 2010 Audrey Kletscher Helbling